Menu

Agent readiness report

dynu.com

What an AI agent can and cannot do on this site, measured by an unauthenticated crawl and scored against the published rubric.

Scanned · rubric v1.0.1 · scored as a general site · re-scan (results are cached for seven days)

What to fix first

Ranked by impact first, then by how cheap the fix is — the same ordering the engine uses.

  1. 1C1

    Form usability

    High impact · Medium effort

    Fix: 6 of 6 inputs have no associated label. A placeholder is not a label — an agent filling your form has no way to know what an unlabelled field wants.

  2. 2B2

    Correct schema types for the site type

    High impact · Medium effort

    Missing: type-specific markup (Article, FAQPage, Service, SoftwareApplication). For a other site, Article or FAQPage or Service or SoftwareApplication is what lets an agent understand what you actually offer rather than that you exist.

  3. 3C4

    Machine endpoints and agent manifests

    High impact · High effort

    No machine-readable endpoint of any kind. Most sites score zero here, which is exactly why it is the cheapest differentiation on this rubric: an agents.json is a static file, and a documented read-only API is usually a subset of something you already run.

  4. 4A4

    llms.txt present

    Medium impact · Low effort

    llms.txt exists but only 0 links carry a description. Add a short description after each link — an undescribed link list gives a model no basis for choosing what to fetch.

  5. 5B4

    Meta and Open Graph

    Medium impact · Low effort

    Fix: 4 title(s) outside 15–70 characters; duplicate titles across pages; 5 description(s) outside 50–160 characters; 6 page(s) missing og:title, og:description or og:image.

Every check, with the evidence

No finding without evidence: each result shows what we actually captured during the crawl.

ADiscovery & access

  • A1Fail

    robots.txt exists and parses

    0/2

    robots.txt exists but contains no parseable directives. Check for HTML being served in its place.

    What we captured
    {
      "bytes": 26441,
      "status": 200,
      "directives": 0
    }
  • A2Pass

    Major AI crawlers allowed

    6/6
    What we captured
    {
      "of": 6,
      "allowed": 6,
      "blocked": []
    }
  • A3Partial

    XML sitemap valid and referenced

    1/3

    Fix: sitemap parsed to zero URLs; not referenced from robots.txt. A sitemap referenced from robots.txt is how a crawler discovers pages that are not linked from the homepage.

    What we captured
    {
      "exists": true,
      "urlCount": 0,
      "referencedInRobots": false
    }
  • A4Partial

    llms.txt present

    1/4

    llms.txt exists but only 0 links carry a description. Add a short description after each link — an undescribed link list gives a model no basis for choosing what to fetch.

    What we captured
    {
      "present": true,
      "anyLinks": 0,
      "llmsFullTxt": true,
      "describedLinks": 0
    }
  • A5Pass

    Bot user-agent HTTP health

    3/3
    What we captured
    {
      "probes": [
        {
          "name": "GPTBot",
          "status": 200,
          "ttfbMs": 193
        },
        {
          "name": "ClaudeBot",
          "status": 200,
          "ttfbMs": 194
        },
        {
          "name": "PerplexityBot",
          "status": 200,
          "ttfbMs": 193
        }
      ],
      "medianTtfbMs": 193,
      "edgeBlockingDespiteRobots": false
    }
  • A6Pass

    No hard interstitial

    2/2
    What we captured
    {
      "markers": []
    }
  • A7Pass

    Server-rendered content parity

    5/5
    What we captured
    {
      "ratio": 1,
      "rawTextLength": 4490,
      "renderedTextLength": 4355
    }

BUnderstanding

  • B1Pass

    JSON-LD present and valid

    5/5
    What we captured
    {
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "pagesWithValidJsonLd": 6,
      "homepageHasValidJsonLd": true,
      "pagesWithInvalidJsonLd": 0
    }
  • B2Partial

    Correct schema types for the site type

    2/5

    Missing: type-specific markup (Article, FAQPage, Service, SoftwareApplication). For a other site, Article or FAQPage or Service or SoftwareApplication is what lets an agent understand what you actually offer rather than that you exist.

    What we captured
    {
      "matched": [],
      "missing": [
        "type-specific markup (Article, FAQPage, Service, SoftwareApplication)"
      ],
      "siteType": "other",
      "typesFound": [
        "Organization"
      ]
    }
  • B3Fail

    Semantic HTML structure

    0/4

    Headings and landmarks are how a machine builds an outline of the page. One h1, no skipped levels, and real main/nav/footer elements — all template-level fixes, applied once.

    What we captured
    {
      "problems": [
        "https://dynu.com: 4 h1 elements",
        "https://dynu.com: skipped heading level",
        "https://dynu.com: missing main",
        "https://dynu.com/en-US/: 4 h1 elements",
        "https://dynu.com/en-US/: skipped heading level",
        "https://dynu.com/en-US/: missing main",
        "https://dynu.com/fr-FR/: 3 h1 elements",
        "https://dynu.com/fr-FR/: skipped heading level",
        "https://dynu.com/fr-FR/: missing main",
        "https://dynu.com/it-IT/: 3 h1 elements"
      ],
      "singleH1": 0,
      "allLandmarks": 0,
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "noSkippedLevels": 0
    }
  • B4Fail

    Meta and Open Graph

    0/3

    Fix: 4 title(s) outside 15–70 characters; duplicate titles across pages; 5 description(s) outside 50–160 characters; 6 page(s) missing og:title, og:description or og:image.

    What we captured
    {
      "goodTitles": 2,
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "uniqueTitles": false,
      "goodDescriptions": 1,
      "completeOpenGraph": 0
    }
  • B5Pass

    Clean text ratio

    3/3
    What we captured
    {
      "perPage": [
        0.114,
        0.12,
        0.165,
        0.132,
        0.048,
        0.123
      ],
      "averageRatio": 0.117
    }
  • B6Pass

    Alt text coverage

    2/2
    What we captured
    {
      "withAlt": 120,
      "coverage": 1,
      "contentImages": 120
    }
  • B7Partial

    Canonical and duplication hygiene

    1/3

    Fix: 6 page(s) missing or with a mismatched rel=canonical. Duplicate hosts split whatever authority the page has earned.

    What we captured
    {
      "hostVariants": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.dynu.com",
          "status": 200
        },
        {
          "url": "http://dynu.com",
          "status": 301,
          "location": "http://www.dynu.com/"
        }
      ],
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "selfConsistentCanonicals": 0
    }

CActionability

  • C1Partial

    Form usability

    2.44/6.11

    Fix: 6 of 6 inputs have no associated label. A placeholder is not a label — an agent filling your form has no way to know what an unlabelled field wants.

    What we captured
    {
      "forms": 6,
      "inputs": 6,
      "realSubmit": true,
      "unlabelled": 6,
      "wrongTypes": 0
    }
  • C2Partial

    Navigable link graph

    3.67/4.89

    Fix: 5% of links use contextless text like "click here".

    What we captured
    {
      "anchors": 77,
      "genericLinks": 4,
      "genericRatio": 0.05,
      "hasBreadcrumb": false,
      "clickableNonAnchors": 0
    }
  • C3Pass

    Interactive element semantics

    4.89/4.89
    What we captured
    {
      "realButtons": 7,
      "positiveTabindex": 0,
      "clickableNonButtons": 0,
      "keyboardTrapsTested": false
    }
  • C4Fail

    Machine endpoints and agent manifests

    0/6.11

    No machine-readable endpoint of any kind. Most sites score zero here, which is exactly why it is the cheapest differentiation on this rubric: an agents.json is a static file, and a documented read-only API is usually a subset of something you already run.

    What we captured
    {
      "found": []
    }
  • C5Not applicable

    Commerce actionability

    0/4

    Not a commerce site; these points are redistributed across C1–C4.

    What we captured
    {
      "siteType": "other"
    }
  • C6Pass

    On-site search

    3/3
    What we captured
    {
      "param": "q",
      "usesGet": true,
      "searchForm": true,
      "searchAction": false
    }

DTrust & freshness

  • D1Partial

    Transport security

    3/4

    Fix: 4 insecure subresource reference(s).

    What we captured
    {
      "hsts": true,
      "tlsValid": true,
      "mixedContentReferences": 4
    }
  • D2Pass

    Verifiable identity

    4/4
    What we captured
    {
      "sameAsCount": 5,
      "contactDiscoverable": true,
      "hasOrganizationSchema": true
    }
  • D3Pass

    Policies discoverable

    4/4
    What we captured
    {
      "hasTerms": true,
      "siteType": "other",
      "hasPrivacy": true,
      "hasReturns": false,
      "hasShipping": true
    }
  • D4Partial

    Freshness signals

    1/4

    Fix: sitemap has no lastmod values; only 0% of sitemap URLs modified in the last 90 days. Staleness is a ranking signal for models deciding what to cite.

    What we captured
    {
      "sitemapUrls": 0,
      "withLastmod": 0,
      "visibleDates": true,
      "modifiedLast90Days": 0
    }
  • D5Pass

    Identity consistency

    3/3
    What we captured
    {
      "title": "Free dynamic DNS service | Dynu Systems, Inc.Free dynamic DNS service | Dynu Systems, Inc.",
      "hasFavicon": true,
      "hasOgImage": true,
      "ogSiteName": "Dynu Systems - Free dynamic DNS service",
      "schemaName": "Dynu"
    }
  • D6Partial

    security.txt

    1/2

    security.txt is present but invalid: no Contact field; no Expires field. An expired Expires field makes the whole file non-conformant, so this fails even though the file was correct when it was written.

    What we captured
    {
      "valid": false,
      "hasContact": false
    }
  • D7Pass

    Multi-page stability

    4/4
    What we captured
    {
      "nonOk": [],
      "slowPages": 0,
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "consistentTemplate": true
    }
65C
Discovery & access18/25
Understanding13/25
Actionability14/25
Trust & freshness20/25

Keep this report

Get the permanent link and the ranked fix list by email. One message, no list.

Want this fixed?

We audit in depth and implement the fixes — in your codebase or your CMS, scoped by architecture.

Own this site?

This report and its leaderboard entry come from a public crawl. Prove you own the domain with an email address on it, and you can hide the report or publish it again yourself, in minutes.

To block future scans instead, disallow AgentFriendlyRankBot in your robots.txt — see how our crawler works.

Scan your own site

Same rubric, same evidence standard, about a minute.

Run a free scan →

Compare dynu.com with another site →