Menu

Agent readiness report

fftechnologies.com

What an AI agent can and cannot do on this site, measured by an unauthenticated crawl and scored against the published rubric.

Scanned · rubric v1.0.1 · scored as a general site · re-scan (results are cached for seven days)

What to fix first

Ranked by impact first, then by how cheap the fix is — the same ordering the engine uses.

  1. 1B2

    Correct schema types for the site type

    High impact · Medium effort

    Missing: type-specific markup (Article, FAQPage, Service, SoftwareApplication). For a other site, Article or FAQPage or Service or SoftwareApplication is what lets an agent understand what you actually offer rather than that you exist.

  2. 2B1

    JSON-LD present and valid

    High impact · Medium effort

    Only 2 of 6 crawled pages carry structured data. Add it at the template level rather than page by page.

  3. 3C4

    Machine endpoints and agent manifests

    High impact · High effort

    Found API documentation link. A second machine surface — an OpenAPI spec or an MCP server — takes this to full marks.

  4. 4B7

    Canonical and duplication hygiene

    Medium impact · Low effort

    Fix: 1 page(s) missing or with a mismatched rel=canonical. Duplicate hosts split whatever authority the page has earned.

  5. 5D2

    Verifiable identity

    Medium impact · Low effort

    Fix: no Organization schema. sameAs links to a company profile are how a model corroborates that you are who the page says you are.

Every check, with the evidence

No finding without evidence: each result shows what we actually captured during the crawl.

ADiscovery & access

  • A1Pass

    robots.txt exists and parses

    2/2
    What we captured
    {
      "groups": 1,
      "status": 200,
      "sitemaps": 1
    }
  • A2Pass

    Major AI crawlers allowed

    6/6
    What we captured
    {
      "of": 6,
      "allowed": 6,
      "blocked": []
    }
  • A3Pass

    XML sitemap valid and referenced

    3/3
    What we captured
    {
      "exists": true,
      "urlCount": 64,
      "referencedInRobots": true
    }
  • A4Partial

    llms.txt present

    3/4

    Add an llms-full.txt containing your key content as one markdown document. Agents that need the substance can then read it in a single fetch instead of a dozen.

    What we captured
    {
      "present": true,
      "llmsFullTxt": false,
      "describedLinks": 61
    }
  • A5Pass

    Bot user-agent HTTP health

    3/3
    What we captured
    {
      "probes": [
        {
          "name": "GPTBot",
          "status": 200,
          "ttfbMs": 636
        },
        {
          "name": "ClaudeBot",
          "status": 200,
          "ttfbMs": 161
        },
        {
          "name": "PerplexityBot",
          "status": 200,
          "ttfbMs": 87
        }
      ],
      "medianTtfbMs": 161,
      "edgeBlockingDespiteRobots": false
    }
  • A6Pass

    No hard interstitial

    2/2
    What we captured
    {
      "markers": []
    }
  • A7Pass

    Server-rendered content parity

    5/5
    What we captured
    {
      "ratio": 1,
      "rawTextLength": 4774,
      "renderedTextLength": 3894
    }

BUnderstanding

  • B1Partial

    JSON-LD present and valid

    3/5

    Only 2 of 6 crawled pages carry structured data. Add it at the template level rather than page by page.

    What we captured
    {
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "pagesWithValidJsonLd": 2,
      "homepageHasValidJsonLd": true,
      "pagesWithInvalidJsonLd": 0
    }
  • B2Partial

    Correct schema types for the site type

    2/5

    Missing: type-specific markup (Article, FAQPage, Service, SoftwareApplication). For a other site, Article or FAQPage or Service or SoftwareApplication is what lets an agent understand what you actually offer rather than that you exist.

    What we captured
    {
      "matched": [],
      "missing": [
        "type-specific markup (Article, FAQPage, Service, SoftwareApplication)"
      ],
      "siteType": "other",
      "typesFound": [
        "WebSite"
      ]
    }
  • B3Fail

    Semantic HTML structure

    0/4

    Headings and landmarks are how a machine builds an outline of the page. One h1, no skipped levels, and real main/nav/footer elements — all template-level fixes, applied once.

    What we captured
    {
      "problems": [
        "https://fftechnologies.com: 4 h1 elements",
        "https://fftechnologies.com: missing footer",
        "https://fftechnologies.com/products: missing footer",
        "https://fftechnologies.com/about: 0 h1 elements",
        "https://fftechnologies.com/about: missing footer",
        "https://fftechnologies.com/contact: 0 h1 elements",
        "https://fftechnologies.com/contact: missing footer",
        "https://fftechnologies.com/home: 4 h1 elements",
        "https://fftechnologies.com/home: missing footer",
        "https://fftechnologies.com/appian: skipped heading level"
      ],
      "singleH1": 2,
      "allLandmarks": 0,
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "noSkippedLevels": 5
    }
  • B4Partial

    Meta and Open Graph

    2/3

    Fix: duplicate titles across pages.

    What we captured
    {
      "goodTitles": 6,
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "uniqueTitles": false,
      "goodDescriptions": 6,
      "completeOpenGraph": 6
    }
  • B5Partial

    Clean text ratio

    1/3

    Visible text is 4.1% of your markup. Deeply nested wrapper elements make a page expensive to parse and dilute the content an agent extracts. Script and style contents are already excluded from this measure, so this is markup weight, not framework overhead.

    What we captured
    {
      "perPage": [
        0.041,
        0.031,
        0.051,
        0.036,
        0.041,
        0.05
      ],
      "averageRatio": 0.041
    }
  • B6Fail

    Alt text coverage

    0/2

    48 of 48 content images have no alt text. An agent cannot see the image; the alt attribute is the only description it gets.

    What we captured
    {
      "withAlt": 0,
      "coverage": 0,
      "contentImages": 48
    }
  • B7Partial

    Canonical and duplication hygiene

    1/3

    Fix: 1 page(s) missing or with a mismatched rel=canonical. Duplicate hosts split whatever authority the page has earned.

    What we captured
    {
      "hostVariants": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.fftechnologies.com",
          "status": 200
        },
        {
          "url": "http://fftechnologies.com",
          "status": 301,
          "location": "https://www.fftechnologies.com/"
        }
      ],
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "selfConsistentCanonicals": 5
    }

CActionability

  • C1Pass

    Form usability

    6.11/6.11
    What we captured
    {
      "forms": 3,
      "inputs": 13,
      "realSubmit": true,
      "unlabelled": 0,
      "wrongTypes": 0
    }
  • C2Fail

    Navigable link graph

    0/4.89

    Fix: 1 clickable element(s) that are not anchors — an agent cannot follow a div; 7% of links use contextless text like "click here"; no breadcrumbs or clear URL hierarchy.

    What we captured
    {
      "anchors": 189,
      "genericLinks": 13,
      "genericRatio": 0.07,
      "hasBreadcrumb": false,
      "clickableNonAnchors": 1
    }
  • C3Partial

    Interactive element semantics

    2.44/4.89

    Fix: 1 element(s) act as buttons without being buttons. A div with a click handler is invisible to anything driving the page programmatically.

    What we captured
    {
      "realButtons": 7,
      "positiveTabindex": 0,
      "clickableNonButtons": 1,
      "keyboardTrapsTested": false
    }
  • C4Partial

    Machine endpoints and agent manifests

    3.67/6.11

    Found API documentation link. A second machine surface — an OpenAPI spec or an MCP server — takes this to full marks.

    What we captured
    {
      "found": [
        "API documentation link"
      ]
    }
  • C5Not applicable

    Commerce actionability

    0/4

    Not a commerce site; these points are redistributed across C1–C4.

    What we captured
    {
      "siteType": "other"
    }
  • C6Fail

    On-site search

    0/3

    No on-site search found. If you have search, expose it as a GET form with a query parameter so an agent can jump straight to results.

    What we captured
    {
      "searchForm": false,
      "searchAction": false
    }

DTrust & freshness

  • D1Partial

    Transport security

    3/4

    Fix: 4 insecure subresource reference(s).

    What we captured
    {
      "hsts": true,
      "tlsValid": true,
      "mixedContentReferences": 4
    }
  • D2Partial

    Verifiable identity

    2/4

    Fix: no Organization schema. sameAs links to a company profile are how a model corroborates that you are who the page says you are.

    What we captured
    {
      "sameAsCount": 0,
      "contactDiscoverable": true,
      "hasOrganizationSchema": false
    }
  • D3Partial

    Policies discoverable

    2/4

    Fix: no terms page linked.

    What we captured
    {
      "hasTerms": false,
      "siteType": "other",
      "hasPrivacy": true,
      "hasReturns": false,
      "hasShipping": false
    }
  • D4Partial

    Freshness signals

    1/4

    Fix: only 0% of sitemap URLs modified in the last 90 days; no visible dates on content. Staleness is a ranking signal for models deciding what to cite.

    What we captured
    {
      "sitemapUrls": 64,
      "withLastmod": 64,
      "visibleDates": false,
      "modifiedLast90Days": 0
    }
  • D5Pass

    Identity consistency

    3/3
    What we captured
    {
      "title": "Records/Documents/Governance | Forefront Technologies",
      "hasFavicon": true,
      "hasOgImage": true,
      "ogSiteName": "",
      "schemaName": "Forefront Technologies"
    }
  • D6Fail

    security.txt

    0/2

    Publish /.well-known/security.txt with a Contact field and a future-dated Expires field. It is a five-line text file.

    What we captured
    {
      "status": 404,
      "present": false
    }
  • D7Pass

    Multi-page stability

    4/4
    What we captured
    {
      "nonOk": [],
      "slowPages": 0,
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "consistentTemplate": true
    }
60C
Discovery & access24/25
Understanding9/25
Actionability12.22/25
Trust & freshness15/25

Keep this report

Get the permanent link and the ranked fix list by email. One message, no list.

Want this fixed?

We audit in depth and implement the fixes — in your codebase or your CMS, scoped by architecture.

Own this site?

This report and its leaderboard entry come from a public crawl. Prove you own the domain with an email address on it, and you can hide the report or publish it again yourself, in minutes.

To block future scans instead, disallow AgentFriendlyRankBot in your robots.txt — see how our crawler works.

Scan your own site

Same rubric, same evidence standard, about a minute.

Run a free scan →

Compare fftechnologies.com with another site →