Menu

Agent readiness report

foxfiresg.com

What an AI agent can and cannot do on this site, measured by an unauthenticated crawl and scored against the published rubric.

Scanned · rubric v1.0.1 · scored as a general site · re-scan (results are cached for seven days)

What to fix first

Ranked by impact first, then by how cheap the fix is — the same ordering the engine uses.

  1. 1B2

    Correct schema types for the site type

    High impact · Medium effort

    Missing: type-specific markup (Article, FAQPage, Service, SoftwareApplication). For a other site, Article or FAQPage or Service or SoftwareApplication is what lets an agent understand what you actually offer rather than that you exist.

  2. 2C4

    Machine endpoints and agent manifests

    High impact · High effort

    No machine-readable endpoint of any kind. Most sites score zero here, which is exactly why it is the cheapest differentiation on this rubric: an agents.json is a static file, and a documented read-only API is usually a subset of something you already run.

  3. 3A4

    llms.txt present

    Medium impact · Low effort

    Publish an llms.txt at the root: an H1, a one-line summary, then described links to your most useful pages. It is a text file and it takes an hour — the cheapest points on this rubric.

  4. 4A5

    Bot user-agent HTTP health

    Medium impact · Low effort

    Your robots.txt welcomes these agents, but ClaudeBot received 0 — the block is happening at your CDN or WAF, before robots.txt is ever read. Cloudflare in particular blocks AI crawlers by default on every plan. One setting change, and it is invisible until someone tests it.

  5. 5B4

    Meta and Open Graph

    Medium impact · Low effort

    Fix: 2 title(s) outside 15–70 characters; 1 description(s) outside 50–160 characters.

Every check, with the evidence

No finding without evidence: each result shows what we actually captured during the crawl.

ADiscovery & access

  • A1Pass

    robots.txt exists and parses

    2/2
    What we captured
    {
      "groups": 1,
      "status": 200,
      "sitemaps": 1
    }
  • A2Pass

    Major AI crawlers allowed

    6/6
    What we captured
    {
      "of": 6,
      "allowed": 6,
      "blocked": []
    }
  • A3Pass

    XML sitemap valid and referenced

    3/3
    What we captured
    {
      "exists": true,
      "urlCount": 100,
      "referencedInRobots": true
    }
  • A4Fail

    llms.txt present

    0/4

    Publish an llms.txt at the root: an H1, a one-line summary, then described links to your most useful pages. It is a text file and it takes an hour — the cheapest points on this rubric.

    What we captured
    {
      "status": 404,
      "present": false
    }
  • A5Partial

    Bot user-agent HTTP health

    1/3

    Your robots.txt welcomes these agents, but ClaudeBot received 0 — the block is happening at your CDN or WAF, before robots.txt is ever read. Cloudflare in particular blocks AI crawlers by default on every plan. One setting change, and it is invisible until someone tests it.

    What we captured
    {
      "probes": [
        {
          "name": "GPTBot",
          "status": 200,
          "ttfbMs": 802
        },
        {
          "name": "ClaudeBot",
          "status": 0,
          "ttfbMs": 10004
        },
        {
          "name": "PerplexityBot",
          "status": 200,
          "ttfbMs": 883
        }
      ],
      "medianTtfbMs": 883,
      "edgeBlockingDespiteRobots": true
    }
  • A6Pass

    No hard interstitial

    2/2
    What we captured
    {
      "markers": []
    }
  • A7Not applicable

    Server-rendered content parity

    0/5

    No headless render was captured, so parity could not be measured. Re-run with rendering enabled.

    What we captured
    {
      "rendered": false
    }

BUnderstanding

  • B1Pass

    JSON-LD present and valid

    5/5
    What we captured
    {
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "pagesWithValidJsonLd": 6,
      "homepageHasValidJsonLd": true,
      "pagesWithInvalidJsonLd": 0
    }
  • B2Partial

    Correct schema types for the site type

    2/5

    Missing: type-specific markup (Article, FAQPage, Service, SoftwareApplication). For a other site, Article or FAQPage or Service or SoftwareApplication is what lets an agent understand what you actually offer rather than that you exist.

    What we captured
    {
      "matched": [],
      "missing": [
        "type-specific markup (Article, FAQPage, Service, SoftwareApplication)"
      ],
      "siteType": "other",
      "typesFound": [
        "ContactPoint",
        "LocalBusiness",
        "MedicalBusiness",
        "MedicalSpecialty :: Optometric",
        "Optician",
        "Organization",
        "PostalAddress",
        "WebPage"
      ]
    }
  • B3Partial

    Semantic HTML structure

    2/4

    Headings and landmarks are how a machine builds an outline of the page. One h1, no skipped levels, and real main/nav/footer elements — all template-level fixes, applied once.

    What we captured
    {
      "problems": [
        "https://foxfiresg.com/products/revenue-cycle-management/: skipped heading level",
        "https://foxfiresg.com/partners-2/: 2 h1 elements"
      ],
      "singleH1": 5,
      "allLandmarks": 6,
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "noSkippedLevels": 5
    }
  • B4Partial

    Meta and Open Graph

    1/3

    Fix: 2 title(s) outside 15–70 characters; 1 description(s) outside 50–160 characters.

    What we captured
    {
      "goodTitles": 4,
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "uniqueTitles": true,
      "goodDescriptions": 5,
      "completeOpenGraph": 6
    }
  • B5Partial

    Clean text ratio

    2/3

    Visible text is 8.3% of your markup. Deeply nested wrapper elements make a page expensive to parse and dilute the content an agent extracts. Script and style contents are already excluded from this measure, so this is markup weight, not framework overhead.

    What we captured
    {
      "perPage": [
        0.067,
        0.102,
        0.038,
        0.128,
        0.052,
        0.108
      ],
      "averageRatio": 0.083
    }
  • B6Pass

    Alt text coverage

    2/2
    What we captured
    {
      "withAlt": 26,
      "coverage": 1,
      "contentImages": 26
    }
  • B7Partial

    Canonical and duplication hygiene

    1/3

    Fix: 1 page(s) missing or with a mismatched rel=canonical. Duplicate hosts split whatever authority the page has earned.

    What we captured
    {
      "hostVariants": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.foxfiresg.com",
          "status": 200
        },
        {
          "url": "http://foxfiresg.com",
          "status": 301,
          "location": "https://foxfiresg.com/"
        }
      ],
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "selfConsistentCanonicals": 5
    }

CActionability

  • C1Pass

    Form usability

    6.11/6.11
    What we captured
    {
      "forms": 2,
      "inputs": 6,
      "realSubmit": true,
      "unlabelled": 0,
      "wrongTypes": 0
    }
  • C2Partial

    Navigable link graph

    3.67/4.89

    Fix: 15% of links use contextless text like "click here".

    What we captured
    {
      "anchors": 123,
      "genericLinks": 18,
      "genericRatio": 0.15,
      "hasBreadcrumb": false,
      "clickableNonAnchors": 0
    }
  • C3Pass

    Interactive element semantics

    4.89/4.89
    What we captured
    {
      "realButtons": 0,
      "positiveTabindex": 0,
      "clickableNonButtons": 0,
      "keyboardTrapsTested": false
    }
  • C4Fail

    Machine endpoints and agent manifests

    0/6.11

    No machine-readable endpoint of any kind. Most sites score zero here, which is exactly why it is the cheapest differentiation on this rubric: an agents.json is a static file, and a documented read-only API is usually a subset of something you already run.

    What we captured
    {
      "found": []
    }
  • C5Not applicable

    Commerce actionability

    0/4

    Not a commerce site; these points are redistributed across C1–C4.

    What we captured
    {
      "siteType": "other"
    }
  • C6Fail

    On-site search

    0/3

    No on-site search found. If you have search, expose it as a GET form with a query parameter so an agent can jump straight to results.

    What we captured
    {
      "searchForm": false,
      "searchAction": false
    }

DTrust & freshness

  • D1Partial

    Transport security

    2/4

    Fix: no Strict-Transport-Security header; 1 insecure subresource reference(s).

    What we captured
    {
      "hsts": false,
      "tlsValid": true,
      "mixedContentReferences": 1
    }
  • D2Partial

    Verifiable identity

    2/4

    Fix: Organization schema has no sameAs links. sameAs links to a company profile are how a model corroborates that you are who the page says you are.

    What we captured
    {
      "sameAsCount": 0,
      "contactDiscoverable": true,
      "hasOrganizationSchema": true
    }
  • D3Pass

    Policies discoverable

    4/4
    What we captured
    {
      "hasTerms": true,
      "siteType": "other",
      "hasPrivacy": true,
      "hasReturns": false,
      "hasShipping": false
    }
  • D4Partial

    Freshness signals

    2/4

    Fix: only 5% of sitemap URLs modified in the last 90 days. Staleness is a ranking signal for models deciding what to cite.

    What we captured
    {
      "sitemapUrls": 100,
      "withLastmod": 100,
      "visibleDates": true,
      "modifiedLast90Days": 5
    }
  • D5Pass

    Identity consistency

    3/3
    What we captured
    {
      "title": "Foxfire Systems Group | Optometry EHR Solutions | Practice Management EHR",
      "hasFavicon": true,
      "hasOgImage": true,
      "ogSiteName": "Foxfire",
      "schemaName": "Welcome to Foxfire Practice Management + EHR 2023"
    }
  • D6Fail

    security.txt

    0/2

    Publish /.well-known/security.txt with a Contact field and a future-dated Expires field. It is a five-line text file.

    What we captured
    {
      "status": 404,
      "present": false
    }
  • D7Pass

    Multi-page stability

    4/4
    What we captured
    {
      "nonOk": [],
      "slowPages": 0,
      "pagesCrawled": 6,
      "consistentTemplate": true
    }
61C
Discovery & access14/25
Understanding15/25
Actionability14.67/25
Trust & freshness17/25

Keep this report

Get the permanent link and the ranked fix list by email. One message, no list.

Want this fixed?

We audit in depth and implement the fixes — in your codebase or your CMS, scoped by architecture.

Own this site?

This report and its leaderboard entry come from a public crawl. Prove you own the domain with an email address on it, and you can hide the report or publish it again yourself, in minutes.

To block future scans instead, disallow AgentFriendlyRankBot in your robots.txt — see how our crawler works.

Scan your own site

Same rubric, same evidence standard, about a minute.

Run a free scan →

Compare foxfiresg.com with another site →