Agent readiness report

prescoinc.com

What an AI agent can and cannot do on this site, measured by an unauthenticated crawl and scored against the published rubric.

Scanned 2026-09-07 · rubric v1.0.1 · scored as a general site · re-scan (results are cached for seven days)

What to fix first

Ranked by impact first, then by how cheap the fix is — the same ordering the engine uses.

1C4
Machine endpoints and agent manifests
High impact · High effort
No machine-readable endpoint of any kind. Most sites score zero here, which is exactly why it is the cheapest differentiation on this rubric: an agents.json is a static file, and a documented read-only API is usually a subset of something you already run.
2A4
llms.txt present
Medium impact · Low effort
llms.txt exists but only 0 links carry a description. Add a short description after each link — an undescribed link list gives a model no basis for choosing what to fetch.
3B4
Meta and Open Graph
Medium impact · Low effort
Fix: 3 title(s) outside 15–70 characters; 5 description(s) outside 50–160 characters; 6 page(s) missing og:title, og:description or og:image.
4D5
Identity consistency
Medium impact · Low effort
Fix: site name differs across title, og:site_name and schema name; no og:image. An unexplained name mismatch reads as a signal the site may not be what it claims.
5D3
Policies discoverable
Medium impact · Low effort
Fix: no terms page linked.

Every check, with the evidence

No finding without evidence: each result shows what we actually captured during the crawl.

ADiscovery & access

A1Fail
robots.txt exists and parses
0/2
robots.txt exists but contains no parseable directives. Check for HTML being served in its place.
What we captured
```
{
  "bytes": 0,
  "status": 200,
  "directives": 0
}
```
A2Pass
Major AI crawlers allowed
6/6
What we captured
```
{
  "of": 6,
  "allowed": 6,
  "blocked": []
}
```
A3Partial
XML sitemap valid and referenced
2/3
Fix: not referenced from robots.txt. A sitemap referenced from robots.txt is how a crawler discovers pages that are not linked from the homepage.
What we captured
```
{
  "exists": true,
  "urlCount": 36,
  "referencedInRobots": false
}
```
A4Partial
llms.txt present
1/4
llms.txt exists but only 0 links carry a description. Add a short description after each link — an undescribed link list gives a model no basis for choosing what to fetch.
What we captured
```
{
  "present": true,
  "anyLinks": 0,
  "llmsFullTxt": false,
  "describedLinks": 0
}
```

A5Pass

Bot user-agent HTTP health

3/3

What we captured

{
  "probes": [
    {
      "name": "GPTBot",
      "status": 200,
      "ttfbMs": 639
    },
    {
      "name": "ClaudeBot",
      "status": 200,
      "ttfbMs": 241
    },
    {
      "name": "PerplexityBot",
      "status": 200,
      "ttfbMs": 240
    }
  ],
  "medianTtfbMs": 241,
  "edgeBlockingDespiteRobots": false
}

A6Pass
No hard interstitial
2/2
What we captured
```
{
  "markers": []
}
```
A7Not applicable
Server-rendered content parity
0/5
No headless render was captured, so parity could not be measured. Re-run with rendering enabled.
What we captured
```
{
  "rendered": false
}
```

BUnderstanding

B1Pass

JSON-LD present and valid

5/5

What we captured

{
  "pagesCrawled": 6,
  "pagesWithValidJsonLd": 6,
  "homepageHasValidJsonLd": true,
  "pagesWithInvalidJsonLd": 0
}

B2Pass

Correct schema types for the site type

5/5

What we captured

{
  "matched": [
    "FAQPage",
    "Service"
  ],
  "missing": [],
  "siteType": "other",
  "typesFound": [
    "Answer",
    "BlogPosting",
    "CollectionPage",
    "ContactPage",
    "ContactPoint",
    "EducationalOccupationalCredential",
    "FAQPage",
    "ImageObject",
    "Offer",
    "OfferCatalog",
    "Organization",
    "PostalAddress",
    "Question",
    "Service",
    "WebPage"
  ]
}

B3Pass

Semantic HTML structure

4/4

What we captured

{
  "problems": [],
  "singleH1": 6,
  "allLandmarks": 6,
  "pagesCrawled": 6,
  "noSkippedLevels": 6
}

B4Fail
Meta and Open Graph
0/3
Fix: 3 title(s) outside 15–70 characters; 5 description(s) outside 50–160 characters; 6 page(s) missing og:title, og:description or og:image.
What we captured
```
{
  "goodTitles": 3,
  "pagesCrawled": 6,
  "uniqueTitles": true,
  "goodDescriptions": 1,
  "completeOpenGraph": 0
}
```

B5Pass

Clean text ratio

3/3

What we captured

{
  "perPage": [
    0.063,
    0.034,
    0.091,
    0.061,
    0.078,
    0.279
  ],
  "averageRatio": 0.101
}

B6Pass

Alt text coverage

2/2

What we captured

{
  "withAlt": 102,
  "coverage": 0.83,
  "contentImages": 123
}

B7Pass

Canonical and duplication hygiene

3/3

What we captured

{
  "hostVariants": [
    {
      "url": "https://www.prescoinc.com",
      "status": 200
    },
    {
      "url": "http://prescoinc.com",
      "status": 301,
      "location": "https://prescoinc.com/"
    }
  ],
  "pagesCrawled": 6,
  "selfConsistentCanonicals": 6
}

CActionability

C1Pass

Form usability

6.11/6.11

What we captured

{
  "forms": 1,
  "inputs": 4,
  "realSubmit": true,
  "unlabelled": 0,
  "wrongTypes": 0
}

C2Fail
Navigable link graph
0/4.89
Fix: 1 clickable element(s) that are not anchors — an agent cannot follow a div; 9% of links use contextless text like "click here"; no breadcrumbs or clear URL hierarchy.
What we captured
```
{
  "anchors": 76,
  "genericLinks": 7,
  "genericRatio": 0.09,
  "hasBreadcrumb": false,
  "clickableNonAnchors": 1
}
```
C3Partial
Interactive element semantics
2.44/4.89
Fix: 1 element(s) act as buttons without being buttons. A div with a click handler is invisible to anything driving the page programmatically.
What we captured
```
{
  "realButtons": 0,
  "positiveTabindex": 0,
  "clickableNonButtons": 1,
  "keyboardTrapsTested": false
}
```
C4Fail
Machine endpoints and agent manifests
0/6.11
No machine-readable endpoint of any kind. Most sites score zero here, which is exactly why it is the cheapest differentiation on this rubric: an agents.json is a static file, and a documented read-only API is usually a subset of something you already run.
What we captured
```
{
  "found": []
}
```
C5Not applicable
Commerce actionability
0/4
Not a commerce site; these points are redistributed across C1–C4.
What we captured
```
{
  "siteType": "other"
}
```
C6Fail
On-site search
0/3
No on-site search found. If you have search, expose it as a GET form with a query parameter so an agent can jump straight to results.
What we captured
```
{
  "searchForm": false,
  "searchAction": false
}
```

DTrust & freshness

D1Pass

Transport security

4/4

What we captured

{
  "hsts": true,
  "tlsValid": true,
  "mixedContentReferences": 0
}

D2Pass

Verifiable identity

4/4

What we captured

{
  "sameAsCount": 1,
  "contactDiscoverable": true,
  "hasOrganizationSchema": true
}

D3Partial

Policies discoverable

2/4

Fix: no terms page linked.

What we captured

{
  "hasTerms": false,
  "siteType": "other",
  "hasPrivacy": true,
  "hasReturns": false,
  "hasShipping": false
}

D4Pass

Freshness signals

4/4

What we captured

{
  "sitemapUrls": 36,
  "withLastmod": 36,
  "visibleDates": true,
  "modifiedLast90Days": 24
}

D5Fail
Identity consistency
0/3
Fix: site name differs across title, og:site_name and schema name; no og:image. An unexplained name mismatch reads as a signal the site may not be what it claims.
What we captured
```
{
  "title": "Product Design & Manufacturing Services | Concept to Production | Presco",
  "hasFavicon": true,
  "hasOgImage": false,
  "ogSiteName": "",
  "schemaName": "Presco Engineering, INC"
}
```
D6Fail
security.txt
0/2
Publish /.well-known/security.txt with a Contact field and a future-dated Expires field. It is a five-line text file.
What we captured
```
{
  "status": 404,
  "present": false
}
```

D7Pass

Multi-page stability

4/4

What we captured

{
  "nonOk": [],
  "slowPages": 0,
  "pagesCrawled": 6,
  "consistentTemplate": true
}

63C

Discovery & access14/25

Understanding22/25

Actionability8.55/25

Trust & freshness18/25

Keep this report

Get the permanent link and the ranked fix list by email. One message, no list.

Want this fixed?

We audit in depth and implement the fixes — in your codebase or your CMS, scoped by architecture.

Request a full audit Book a call

Own this site?

This report and its leaderboard entry come from a public crawl. Prove you own the domain with an email address on it, and you can hide the report or publish it again yourself, in minutes.

Claim this site

To block future scans instead, disallow AgentFriendlyRankBot in your robots.txt — see how our crawler works.

Scan your own site

Same rubric, same evidence standard, about a minute.

Run a free scan →

Compare prescoinc.com with another site →

prescoinc.com

What to fix first

Machine endpoints and agent manifests

llms.txt present

Meta and Open Graph

Identity consistency

Policies discoverable

Every check, with the evidence

ADiscovery & access

robots.txt exists and parses

Major AI crawlers allowed

XML sitemap valid and referenced

llms.txt present

Bot user-agent HTTP health

No hard interstitial

Server-rendered content parity

BUnderstanding

JSON-LD present and valid

Correct schema types for the site type

Semantic HTML structure

Meta and Open Graph

Clean text ratio

Alt text coverage

Canonical and duplication hygiene

CActionability

Form usability

Navigable link graph

Interactive element semantics

Machine endpoints and agent manifests

Commerce actionability

On-site search

DTrust & freshness

Transport security

Verifiable identity

Policies discoverable

Freshness signals

Identity consistency

security.txt

Multi-page stability

Keep this report

Want this fixed?

Own this site?

Scan your own site