Agent readiness report

techizen.com

What an AI agent can and cannot do on this site, measured by an unauthenticated crawl and scored against the published rubric.

Scanned 2026-09-08 · rubric v1.0.1 · scored as a general site · re-scan (results are cached for seven days)

What to fix first

Ranked by impact first, then by how cheap the fix is — the same ordering the engine uses.

1C4
Machine endpoints and agent manifests
High impact · High effort
No machine-readable endpoint of any kind. Most sites score zero here, which is exactly why it is the cheapest differentiation on this rubric: an agents.json is a static file, and a documented read-only API is usually a subset of something you already run.
2B7
Canonical and duplication hygiene
Medium impact · Low effort
Fix: 5 page(s) missing or with a mismatched rel=canonical; www/non-www or http/https variants do not resolve to one canonical host. Duplicate hosts split whatever authority the page has earned.
3B4
Meta and Open Graph
Medium impact · Low effort
Fix: 4 description(s) outside 50–160 characters; 5 page(s) missing og:title, og:description or og:image.
4A4
llms.txt present
Medium impact · Low effort
Add an llms-full.txt containing your key content as one markdown document. Agents that need the substance can then read it in a single fetch instead of a dozen.
5D1
Transport security
Medium impact · Low effort
Fix: 12 insecure subresource reference(s).

Every check, with the evidence

No finding without evidence: each result shows what we actually captured during the crawl.

ADiscovery & access

A1Pass
robots.txt exists and parses
2/2
What we captured
```
{
  "groups": 5,
  "status": 200,
  "sitemaps": 1
}
```
A2Pass
Major AI crawlers allowed
6/6
What we captured
```
{
  "of": 6,
  "allowed": 6,
  "blocked": []
}
```

A3Pass

XML sitemap valid and referenced

3/3

What we captured

{
  "exists": true,
  "urlCount": 32,
  "referencedInRobots": true
}

A4Partial
llms.txt present
3/4
Add an llms-full.txt containing your key content as one markdown document. Agents that need the substance can then read it in a single fetch instead of a dozen.
What we captured
```
{
  "present": true,
  "llmsFullTxt": false,
  "describedLinks": 17
}
```

A5Pass

Bot user-agent HTTP health

3/3

What we captured

{
  "probes": [
    {
      "name": "GPTBot",
      "status": 200,
      "ttfbMs": 555
    },
    {
      "name": "ClaudeBot",
      "status": 200,
      "ttfbMs": 82
    },
    {
      "name": "PerplexityBot",
      "status": 200,
      "ttfbMs": 84
    }
  ],
  "medianTtfbMs": 84,
  "edgeBlockingDespiteRobots": false
}

A6Pass
No hard interstitial
2/2
What we captured
```
{
  "markers": []
}
```

A7Pass

Server-rendered content parity

5/5

What we captured

{
  "ratio": 1,
  "rawTextLength": 17073,
  "renderedTextLength": 17035
}

BUnderstanding

B1Pass

JSON-LD present and valid

5/5

What we captured

{
  "pagesCrawled": 6,
  "pagesWithValidJsonLd": 6,
  "homepageHasValidJsonLd": true,
  "pagesWithInvalidJsonLd": 0
}

B2Pass

Correct schema types for the site type

5/5

What we captured

{
  "matched": [
    "FAQPage",
    "Service"
  ],
  "missing": [],
  "siteType": "other",
  "typesFound": [
    "AggregateRating",
    "Answer",
    "ContactPoint",
    "FAQPage",
    "Organization",
    "Person",
    "PostalAddress",
    "Question",
    "Rating",
    "Review",
    "Service"
  ]
}

B3Partial

Semantic HTML structure

2/4

Headings and landmarks are how a machine builds an outline of the page. One h1, no skipped levels, and real main/nav/footer elements — all template-level fixes, applied once.

What we captured

{
  "problems": [
    "https://techizen.com: skipped heading level",
    "https://techizen.com/about: 4 h1 elements",
    "https://techizen.com/about: skipped heading level",
    "https://techizen.com/contact: skipped heading level",
    "https://techizen.com/blog: skipped heading level",
    "https://techizen.com/foundry: skipped heading level",
    "https://techizen.com/services: skipped heading level"
  ],
  "singleH1": 5,
  "allLandmarks": 6,
  "pagesCrawled": 6,
  "noSkippedLevels": 0
}

B4Partial
Meta and Open Graph
1/3
Fix: 4 description(s) outside 50–160 characters; 5 page(s) missing og:title, og:description or og:image.
What we captured
```
{
  "goodTitles": 6,
  "pagesCrawled": 6,
  "uniqueTitles": true,
  "goodDescriptions": 2,
  "completeOpenGraph": 1
}
```
B5Partial
Clean text ratio
1/3
Visible text is 4.8% of your markup. Deeply nested wrapper elements make a page expensive to parse and dilute the content an agent extracts. Script and style contents are already excluded from this measure, so this is markup weight, not framework overhead.
What we captured
```
{
  "perPage": [
    0.06,
    0.015,
    0.046,
    0.072,
    0.042,
    0.051
  ],
  "averageRatio": 0.048
}
```

B6Pass

Alt text coverage

2/2

What we captured

{
  "withAlt": 130,
  "coverage": 0.98,
  "contentImages": 132
}

B7Fail

Canonical and duplication hygiene

0/3

Fix: 5 page(s) missing or with a mismatched rel=canonical; www/non-www or http/https variants do not resolve to one canonical host. Duplicate hosts split whatever authority the page has earned.

What we captured

{
  "hostVariants": [
    {
      "url": "https://www.techizen.com",
      "error": "fetch failed",
      "status": 0
    },
    {
      "url": "http://techizen.com",
      "status": 308,
      "location": "https://techizen.com/"
    }
  ],
  "pagesCrawled": 6,
  "selfConsistentCanonicals": 1
}

CActionability

C1Pass

Form usability

6.11/6.11

What we captured

{
  "forms": 8,
  "inputs": 17,
  "realSubmit": true,
  "unlabelled": 0,
  "wrongTypes": 0
}

C2Partial
Navigable link graph
2.44/4.89
Fix: 74% of links use contextless text like "click here"; no breadcrumbs or clear URL hierarchy.
What we captured
```
{
  "anchors": 145,
  "genericLinks": 108,
  "genericRatio": 0.74,
  "hasBreadcrumb": false,
  "clickableNonAnchors": 0
}
```

C3Pass

Interactive element semantics

4.89/4.89

What we captured

{
  "realButtons": 17,
  "positiveTabindex": 0,
  "clickableNonButtons": 0,
  "keyboardTrapsTested": false
}

C4Fail
Machine endpoints and agent manifests
0/6.11
No machine-readable endpoint of any kind. Most sites score zero here, which is exactly why it is the cheapest differentiation on this rubric: an agents.json is a static file, and a documented read-only API is usually a subset of something you already run.
What we captured
```
{
  "found": []
}
```
C5Not applicable
Commerce actionability
0/4
Not a commerce site; these points are redistributed across C1–C4.
What we captured
```
{
  "siteType": "other"
}
```
C6Fail
On-site search
0/3
No on-site search found. If you have search, expose it as a GET form with a query parameter so an agent can jump straight to results.
What we captured
```
{
  "searchForm": false,
  "searchAction": false
}
```

DTrust & freshness

D1Partial
Transport security
3/4
Fix: 12 insecure subresource reference(s).
What we captured
```
{
  "hsts": true,
  "tlsValid": true,
  "mixedContentReferences": 12
}
```

D2Pass

Verifiable identity

4/4

What we captured

{
  "sameAsCount": 3,
  "contactDiscoverable": true,
  "hasOrganizationSchema": true
}

D3Pass

Policies discoverable

4/4

What we captured

{
  "hasTerms": true,
  "siteType": "other",
  "hasPrivacy": true,
  "hasReturns": false,
  "hasShipping": false
}

D4Partial
Freshness signals
3/4
Fix: no visible dates on content. Staleness is a ranking signal for models deciding what to cite.
What we captured
```
{
  "sitemapUrls": 32,
  "withLastmod": 32,
  "visibleDates": false,
  "modifiedLast90Days": 32
}
```

D5Pass

Identity consistency

3/3

What we captured

{
  "title": "TechiZen | AI Solutions for Modern Business",
  "hasFavicon": true,
  "hasOgImage": true,
  "ogSiteName": "TechiZen",
  "schemaName": "TechiZen"
}

D6Fail
security.txt
0/2
Publish /.well-known/security.txt with a Contact field and a future-dated Expires field. It is a five-line text file.
What we captured
```
{
  "status": 404,
  "present": false
}
```

D7Pass

Multi-page stability

4/4

What we captured

{
  "nonOk": [],
  "slowPages": 0,
  "pagesCrawled": 6,
  "consistentTemplate": true
}

74B

Discovery & access24/25

Understanding16/25

Actionability13.44/25

Trust & freshness21/25

Keep this report

Get the permanent link and the ranked fix list by email. One message, no list.

Want this fixed?

We audit in depth and implement the fixes — in your codebase or your CMS, scoped by architecture.

Request a full audit Book a call

Show off your score

Grade B or better earns the badge. It links back to this report and updates when your score does.

<a href="https://agentfriendlyrank.com/site/techizen.com">
  <img src="https://agentfriendlyrank.com/badge/techizen.com.svg"
    alt="Agent Readiness Score 74/100, grade B" height="20">
</a>

Own this site?

This report and its leaderboard entry come from a public crawl. Prove you own the domain with an email address on it, and you can hide the report or publish it again yourself, in minutes.

Claim this site

To block future scans instead, disallow AgentFriendlyRankBot in your robots.txt — see how our crawler works.

Scan your own site

Same rubric, same evidence standard, about a minute.

Run a free scan →

Compare techizen.com with another site →

techizen.com

What to fix first

Machine endpoints and agent manifests

Canonical and duplication hygiene

Meta and Open Graph

llms.txt present

Transport security

Every check, with the evidence

ADiscovery & access

robots.txt exists and parses

Major AI crawlers allowed

XML sitemap valid and referenced

llms.txt present

Bot user-agent HTTP health

No hard interstitial

Server-rendered content parity

BUnderstanding

JSON-LD present and valid

Correct schema types for the site type

Semantic HTML structure

Meta and Open Graph

Clean text ratio

Alt text coverage

Canonical and duplication hygiene

CActionability

Form usability

Navigable link graph

Interactive element semantics

Machine endpoints and agent manifests

Commerce actionability

On-site search

DTrust & freshness

Transport security

Verifiable identity

Policies discoverable

Freshness signals

Identity consistency

security.txt

Multi-page stability

Keep this report

Want this fixed?

Show off your score

Own this site?

Scan your own site